| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 2 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 292 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 282-302 (cM)
87.8-94.0 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | LEI0147 |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | MCW0096 |
| Marker type: | Microsatellites |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | Genome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
P_values | <0.2 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #1920
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | The G0 consisted of 2 broiler dam lines origination from the White Plymouth Rock breed. The design was based on a 3-generation full-sib-half-sib design consisting of parents G1, full-sib offspring G2, and half-sib grandoffspring G3. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | The 3 groups of G3 birds were weighed at slaughter when they were 7 wk of age, 9 wk of age, and 10 wk of age. After slaughter the weight of the abdominal fat pad was measured and adjusted for BW. |
| Analysis: | The analysis is an across-family weighted full-sib regression analysis. Because marker-QTL linkage phase can differ between families, QTL analysis was nested within families. |
| Software: | |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Jennen DG, Vereijken AL, Bovenhuis H, Crooijmans RP, Veenendaal A, van der PoelJJ, Groenen MA. |
| Affiliation: | Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group,Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands.danyel.jennen@wur.nl |
| Title: | Detection and localization of quantitative trait loci affecting fatness inbroilers. |
| Journal: | Poultry Sci, 2004, 83(3):295-301 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #15049477
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
