| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 10 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 92 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 82-101 (cM)
14.4-17.8 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | MCW0035 |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | ADL0158 |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | Microsatellites |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | Chromosome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
P_values | <0.05 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #2234
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Two genetically different outcross dam lines originating from the White Plymouth Rock breed were chosen as the foundation of this experimental population. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | Body weight, hematocrit value, live abnormalities, heart sac fluid, right ventricle weight, total ventricle weight, abdominal cavity fluid, brest color, and mortality were all measured. |
| Analysis: | A total of 420 microsatellite markers were used. Full-sib QTL analysis was undertaken using the regression interval mapping methodology, in which a single QTL was fitted within each family. |
| Software: | CriMap |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Rabie TS, Crooijmans RP, Bovenhuis H, Vereijken AL, Veenendaal T, van der PoelJJ, Van Arendonk JA, Pakdel A, Groenen MA. |
| Affiliation: | Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences,Wageningen, The Netherlands. |
| Title: | Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting susceptibility in chickento develop pulmonary hypertension syndrome. |
| Journal: | Animal Genetics, 2005, 36(6):468-76 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | ascites conditions |
User inputs on reference #16293119
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
