| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 5 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 181 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 162-198 (cM)
48.0-58.6 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | MCW0026 |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | ROS0330 |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | Microsatellites |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | n/a |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
F_Stat | 11.87 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #3322
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | A 3 generation design was performed by inter-crossing 2 experimental meat-type chicken lines that were divergently selected on fatness referred to as fat and lean lines. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | Body weight and abdominal fat weight were both measured. |
| Analysis: | Microsatellite markers on GGA5 were chosen from the genetic consensus map based on their location on the chromosome. QTL interval mapping was performed with 3 different models: line-cross and half-sib models for F2 and a back-cross model for BC2. |
| Software: | Genotyper Analysis software and CriMap |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | B. Abasht, F. Pitel, S. Lagarrigue, E. Le Bihan-Duval, P. Le Roy, O. Demeure, F. Vignoles, J. Simon, L. Cogburn, S. Aggrey, A. V |
| Affiliation: | UMR Inra-Agrocampus Genetique animale, Rennes, France; Laboratoire de genetique cellulaire, Auzeville, France; Station de recherches avicoles, Nouzilly, France; University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA; University of Georgia, Athens, |
| Title: | Fatness QTL on chicken chromosome 5 and interaction with sex. |
| Journal: | Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE, 2006, 38: 297-311 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #16635451
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
