| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 3 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 180.9 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 179.10-179.30 (cM)
133.9-134.1 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Comparison-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | 0.018 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | ACVRL1 (activin A receptor type II-like 1) |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #57495
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Animals were Pampinta, Corriedale, Indonesian Thin Tailed, and Indonesian fat tailed sheep. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped for 41 SNPs in candidate genes involved in immune system pathways and analyzed for traits associated with response to gastrointestinal nematode challenge. |
| Analysis: | A complete fixed-effect model was used for association analysis. |
| Software: | FSTAT, SPSS, PHASE, ARLEQUIN, LSMLMW |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Periasamy K, Pichler R, Poli M, Cristel S, Cetrá B, Medus D, Basar M, Thiruvenkadan AK, Ramasamy S, Ellahi MB, Mohammed F, Teneva A, Shamsuddin M, Podesta MG, Diallo A |
| Affiliation: | Animal Production and Health Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria |
| Title: | Candidate gene approach for parasite resistance in sheep--variation in immune pathway genes and association with fecal egg count |
| Journal: | PloS One, 2014, 9(2): e88337 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | ACVRL1_445 |
User inputs on reference #24533078
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
