| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 8 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 67.68 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 60.4-62.2 (cM)
72.0-77.4 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | S0017 |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | S0086 |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | Microsatellites |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | n/a |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | <0.04 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | CCKAR (cholecystokinin A receptor) |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #10590
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | The F2 population was derived from a cross between Meishan and Large White pigs. Larger-scale association analysis was carried out in commercial lines consisting of Duroc and Large White, Pietrain, and Hampshire. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | The selection criteria were applied when animals had ad libitum access to feed: daily feed intake, lean feed conversion, and lean growth rate. |
| Analysis: | In the F2 population, the genotype and phenotype information was analyzed using the restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. |
| Software: | Microsoft Excel, Genstat 6.1 |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | R.D. Houston, C.S. Haley, A.L. Archibald, N.D. Cameron, G.S. Plastow, K.A. Rance |
| Affiliation: | Roslin Institute, Midlothian, Scotland; Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland; University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland; Kingston Bagpuize, Oxfordshire, England |
| Title: | A Polymorphism in the 5`-Unstranslated Region of the Porcine Cholecystokinin Type A Receptor Gene Affects Feed Intake and Growth |
| Journal: | Genetics, 2006, 174(3): 1555-1563 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #16951077
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
