| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 16 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 93 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 77 (cM)
0.3-75.5 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | n/a |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
F_Stat | 5.52 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | 0.009 |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #12534
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | The animals used were from a 3-generation F2 population based on cross-breeding of two boars of the naturalized Brazilian Piau breed with 18 commercial females (Landrace x Large White x Pietrain).There were a total of 617 F2 animals. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped for eleven microsatellite markers distributed on chromosome 16 (4), 17(4) and 18 (3), and analyzed for carcass composition, internal organs, and meat quality traits |
| Analysis: | Segregating markers and traits in the F2 of resource families are analyzed with a least-squares method. Critical threshold values of the test statistic were derived by a permutation test |
| Software: | QTL Express software; CRIMAP software; CERVUS v.3.0 software |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Paixao DM, Silva Filho MI, Pereira MS, Lopes MS, Barbosa L, Souza KRS, Lopes PS and Guimaraes SEF |
| Affiliation: | Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil |
| Title: | Quantitative trait loci for carcass, internal organ and meat quality traits on porcine chromosomes 16, 17 and 18 |
| Journal: | Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2008, 31 (4) 898-901 |
| Links: |
No PubMed entry | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #ISU0043
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
