| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 4 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 13.6 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 7.16-7.25 (cM)
5.4-5.5 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Comparison-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | 0.02 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | TRIB1 (tribbles homolog 1 (Drosophila)) |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #24090
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Animals were Duroc pigs. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | A previously identified QTL region for serum triglyceride level was refined by genotyping for four additional microsatellites. Animals were also genotyped for polymorphisms in LRP12 and TRIB1 and analyzed for serum and muscle lipid traits. |
| Analysis: | QTL analyses were performed using a regression approach. LRP12 and TRIB1 association analyses were carried out with PROC GLM. |
| Software: | CRIMAP, QTL Express, SAS |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Melo C, Quintanilla R, Gallardo D, Zidi A, Jordana J, Díaz I, Pena R N, Amills M |
| Affiliation: | Department of Animal Genetics, Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Spain. |
| Title: | Association analysis with lipid traits of 2 candidate genes (LRP12 and TRIB1) mapping to a SSC4 QTL for serum triglyceride concentration in pigs |
| Journal: | Journal of animal science, 2013, 91(4): 1531-7 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | c.*156_157del; in longissumus thoracis IM fat |
User inputs on reference #23408821
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
